Stablecoins are rapidly shifting from a crypto trading utility into a piece of 'core financial infrastructure', according to new research from a16z crypto research—an evolution the firm says is being driven by clearer regulation, expanding payment use cases, and faster on-chain circulation.
In a recent report built around nine charts mapping how the market is changing, a16z crypto research argues the key story is not just bigger volumes, but a change in what stablecoins are used for. Once primarily a tool to move U.S. dollars between exchanges, stablecoins are increasingly functioning as general-purpose payment rails for commerce and business activity, particularly across Asia. The report also highlights a growing role for non-dollar stablecoins as regulation reshapes where and how users access them.
Regulation is one of the most visible catalysts. In the U.S., the report points to the GENIUS Act—widely interpreted as the first meaningful federal framework for stablecoin issuance—as a accelerant rather than the origin of growth. Adjusted stablecoin transfer volume was already rising before the bill advanced, but the slope steepened afterward, reaching roughly $4.5 trillion in adjusted volume in the first quarter of 2026, the researchers said.
Europe’s regulatory impact has taken a different form. After MiCA implementation, several major exchanges moved to delist Tether (USDT) in certain venues, a shift that coincided with a surge in non-dollar stablecoin trading. That activity briefly topped $40 billion before settling into a more sustained band of roughly $15 billion to $25 billion per month. The dynamic suggests regulation can do more than constrain supply—it can also force the market to develop liquidity in segments that previously struggled to form, effectively turning non-dollar stablecoins from a niche product into an observable market category.
On the demand side, a16z crypto research sees 'commerce' as the structural driver. While consumer-to-consumer (C2C) transfers still account for the majority of transactions by count, consumer-to-business activity is growing faster. The report estimates consumer-to-business transactions rose from 124.9 million in 2024 to 284.6 million in 2025—an increase of 128% year over year—signaling that stablecoins are increasingly being spent on real goods and services rather than simply held or rotated through exchanges.
Card-linked stablecoin spending is also showing measurable momentum. The report cites data tied to Rain-powered stablecoin card programs—including Ether.fi Cash, Kast, and Offramp-linked offerings such as Wallbit—where monthly collateral deposits rose from near-zero in November 2024 to more than $300 million by early 2026. While collateral deposits are not a direct measure of end-user spending, a16z crypto research frames the figure as a useful proxy for the growth of stablecoin-based consumer payments in traditional card form factors.
Another notable change is 'velocity'—how frequently stablecoins are being used relative to supply. Since early 2024, the ratio of adjusted monthly transfer volume to circulating supply climbed from about 2.6x to around 6x, according to the report. In practical terms, that implies usage is scaling faster than issuance, with each marginal stablecoin dollar being reused more often for payments, transfers, and treasury movements. a16z crypto research interprets this as a market moving from a 'stored currency' mindset toward a 'spent currency' reality.
The composition of volume is changing as well. Excluding activity tied to trading, yield strategies, and internal exchange flows, the report estimates real payment volumes at roughly $350 billion to $550 billion last year. By value, business-to-business transfers represented the largest share, while peer-to-peer payments and merchant spending also expanded quickly—reinforcing the view that stablecoins are now touching the real economy rather than remaining confined to crypto-native speculation and exchange settlement.
Geography remains highly concentrated. Around two-thirds of stablecoin payment volume comes from Asia, with Singapore, Hong Kong, and Japan highlighted as key hubs. North America accounts for roughly a quarter, while Europe contributes about 13%. Latin America and Africa combined remain below $1 billion, underscoring that despite the narrative of global accessibility, stablecoin payment adoption is still clustered in a handful of leading regions.
That said, a16z crypto research points to emerging markets as a different kind of growth vector—particularly where stablecoins integrate with local payment infrastructure. Brazil’s real-denominated stablecoin BRLA was cited as an example: monthly transfer volume grew from nearly zero in early 2023 to roughly $400 million by early 2026, with adoption supported by integration with PIX, the country’s instant payment system. The case suggests stablecoins are not only a mechanism for exporting dollar liquidity, but can also serve as a bridge between local currencies and global blockchain rails.
Perhaps counterintuitively, domestic stablecoin payments appear to be outpacing cross-border flows. The report estimates domestic transactions rose from about half of total payment volume in early 2024 to nearly three-quarters by early 2026. While stablecoins are often framed as a breakthrough for remittances and FX, a16z crypto research argues actual usage is increasingly 'localized'—global by design, but progressively embedded in everyday domestic commerce.
The report concludes that the next competitive battleground may not be raw issuance alone, but the speed at which stablecoins secure distribution and integration into payment networks. In markets where regulatory clarity, card connectivity, merchant acceptance, and local payment-system integration move in tandem, the winners could consolidate quickly—turning stablecoins from crypto’s settlement layer into a durable part of modern financial infrastructure.
🔎 Market Interpretation
- Stablecoins are evolving from exchange plumbing to mainstream rails: a16z frames the market shift as primarily usage transformation (payments/treasury) rather than only growth in headline volume.
- Regulation is shaping market structure, not just restricting it: the U.S. GENIUS Act is described as an accelerant (volume trend steepened afterward), while Europe’s MiCA-driven USDT delistings helped create liquidity for non-dollar stablecoins.
- On-chain circulation is intensifying: stablecoin “velocity” (adjusted monthly transfer volume vs. supply) rose from ~2.6x (early 2024) to ~6x, implying each unit of stablecoin is being reused more frequently.
- Commerce is the structural demand driver: consumer-to-business transfer counts grew from 124.9M (2024) to 284.6M (2025), indicating increasing spend on real goods/services vs. purely trading-related flows.
- Payments are Asia-led and domestically oriented: ~2/3 of payment volume is attributed to Asia (notably Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan), and domestic stablecoin payments rose from ~50% (early 2024) to ~75% (early 2026).
- “Real economy” volumes are becoming measurable: excluding trading/yield/exchange-internal activity, payment volumes are estimated at ~$350B–$550B (last year), with B2B the largest by value.
💡 Strategic Points
- Distribution beats issuance: competitive advantage may shift to whoever wins integration (merchant acceptance, card connectivity, payment network partnerships) rather than who issues the most supply.
- Regulatory arbitrage is becoming product segmentation: MiCA’s impact suggests non-dollar stablecoins can move from niche to a sustained category once forced liquidity forms—creating new corridors, pairs, and treasury options.
- Watch “velocity” as a leading indicator: rising reuse per dollar signals growing transactional utility; if velocity keeps climbing while supply growth slows, the market is behaving more like payments infrastructure than a stored-value pool.
- Card-linked programs are a bridge to everyday spend: Rain-linked card programs saw monthly collateral deposits climb from near-zero (Nov 2024) to >$300M (early 2026). Treat as a proxy for consumer payment activity and distribution traction.
- B2B is the anchor use case by value: business-to-business flows dominate “real payment” value, implying stablecoins are increasingly used for treasury movements, settlement, and operational payments—areas where reliability and compliance matter most.
- Localization is the near-term adoption pattern: despite the remittance narrative, the data suggests stablecoins succeed fastest when embedded in domestic commerce and local payment stacks.
- Emerging-market upside depends on local rails integration: Brazil’s BRLA growth (to ~ $400M monthly by early 2026) is tied to PIX integration—suggesting the playbook is “stablecoin + instant payments” rather than “stablecoin alone.”
- Regional concentration is a risk and an opportunity: Asia’s dominance implies scale and network effects there, but also reveals underpenetrated regions (LatAm/Africa) where infrastructure, compliance, and on/off-ramps remain bottlenecks.
📘 Glossary
- Stablecoin: a blockchain-based token designed to maintain a stable value, commonly pegged to a fiat currency (e.g., USD).
- Adjusted transfer volume: an estimate of transfer activity after filtering out spam, wash flows, or distortive on-chain movements to better reflect meaningful usage.
- Velocity (of stablecoins): the ratio of transfer volume to circulating supply; higher velocity means each unit is used more frequently for transactions.
- Circulating supply: total amount of a stablecoin currently issued and available in the market.
- C2C (Consumer-to-Consumer): transfers between individuals, often P2P payments.
- C2B (Consumer-to-Business): payments from individuals to merchants or businesses for goods and services.
- B2B (Business-to-Business): transfers between companies, often for settlement, payroll, vendor payments, or treasury operations.
- MiCA: the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation; sets rules for crypto assets and stablecoin issuance/operations in Europe.
- GENIUS Act: referenced as a U.S. federal legislative framework aimed at stablecoin issuance and oversight; characterized here as accelerating an existing growth trend.
- Non-dollar stablecoins: stablecoins pegged to currencies other than USD (e.g., EUR, JPY, BRL), often used for localized payments or regulated market access.
- On/off-ramps: services that convert between fiat money and crypto assets (bank transfers, cards, brokers).
- Card-linked stablecoin spending: stablecoin-funded card programs that allow users to spend via traditional card networks, typically requiring collateral/deposits.
- PIX: Brazil’s instant payment system that enables real-time transfers; integration can materially increase stablecoin utility domestically.
Comment 0