The rise of quantum computing is fueling debate across the crypto community, with many asking whether Bitcoin’s cryptography could one day be broken. IBM’s latest roadmap offers both progress and concern, highlighting that the timeline for a quantum threat may be shorter than many expect.
IBM recently announced advancements toward its Starling project, a fault-tolerant quantum computer expected by 2029. Unlike today’s noisy machines, Starling aims to run stable, large-scale algorithms. A major innovation is the use of qLDPC error-correction codes, which reduce the number of physical qubits required to create usable logical qubits. This efficiency makes it more realistic for a future machine to run Shor’s algorithm, capable of breaking Bitcoin’s elliptic curve cryptography.
Michael Osborne, CTO of IBM Quantum Safe, cautions that while headlines often oversimplify, the real challenge lies in logical qubits, not experimental ones. He notes that estimates for breaking cryptography vary depending on trade-offs between qubit count and attack duration. For example, Google researchers suggested RSA-2048 might fall with 1,600 logical qubits in a week, showing how assumptions can drastically alter projections.
The risks extend beyond wallets. Consensus protocols, time servers, and oracles could all be exploited if not quantum-resistant. Osborne warns that the first real breakthroughs likely won’t be publicized—early attackers may quietly target dormant Bitcoin wallets.
Migration to post-quantum cryptography is critical, but coordinating upgrades across global blockchain networks is complex. Osborne compares the challenge to Y2K, emphasizing that waiting only raises costs. Hybrid solutions may help, though they often require dual infrastructures.
Ultimately, the most important signal may be market-driven. If investors lose faith in non-quantum-safe systems, capital flight could destabilize ecosystems quickly. Osborne’s message is clear: awareness and early preparation are essential. The future of Bitcoin security hinges on how fast the industry embraces quantum-safe cryptography.
Comment 0