Link copied 
The District of Columbia Circuit Court delivered a strong blow to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), reversing a pivotal decision from 2020 concerning the SPIKES Index securities. The regulatory agency's order had been to categorize these assets as “futures”, but the court has now determined they fall under the more stringent bracket of “securities futures”.
In an unexpected turn, the panel of judges dubbed the SEC's original order as "arbitrary and capricious". This categorization by the Clark County Bar Association suggests a decision with no clear reasoning, described as “baseless”.
The SEC had initially placed SPIKES Index, a stock volatility index, outside the sector of “securities futures”. This move had eased the tax burden and other regulatory protocols linked to this classification. Their rationale was simple - boost competition among volatility indexes. However, the court countered this reasoning, stating the SEC did not justify its decision properly, nor did it adequately consider the potential for market confusion.
The fallout of this decision means SPIKES Index futures will now have to wear the 'securities futures' label. This sudden shift has put market players in a tight spot, who now have just three months to wrap up their dealings.
This ruling could also shed light on future litigation outcomes between the SEC and cryptocurrency firms. As pointed out by a lawyer known as "MetaLawMan", the court's panel includes two judges who are also part of a review regarding a challenge by Grayscale. They had appealed against an SEC decision to refuse the conversion of its Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) into a spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF).
Eric Balchunas, a seasoned ETF analyst from Bloomberg, drew attention to an undeniable fact; the SEC is not immune to losses in court battles. This case serves as a reminder of the regulator's vulnerability, shaking up the perception of its invulnerability.
