Link copied 
Recently, the cryptocurrency exchange Binance and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have collectively rebutted the attempt by Eeon, a seemingly dubious entity, to insert itself in the ongoing litigation between the two parties.
Eeon sought to become an intervening force on behalf of the customers embroiled in the SEC's legal pursuit against Binance. However, its bid was met with staunch resistance from both the SEC and Binance. They cited Eeon's failure to meet the legal criteria for intervention, and the lack of requisite consent, as the rationale behind their objection.
The SEC did not mince words in stating that Eeon has a notorious history of unsuccessfully representing itself in the courtrooms. Further, the Securities Exchange Act has a stringent prohibition against private entities attempting to interfere in such matters. The regulatory body emphasized that Eeon's entry would be insignificant as their claims barely deviate from those of the defendants. The SEC also pointed out the conflicting nature of Eeon's counter-arguments.
Moreover, Binance reiterated three main reasons to brush off Eeon's plea: lack of SEC approval, Eeon's inability to prove itself as a valid stakeholder, and its deficient compliance with legal prerequisites for intervening. In unity against Eeon's interference, Binance and its CEO Changpeng "CZ" Zhao expressed their vehement opposition.
In a parallel development, Binance has sought to squash the lawsuit filed against it by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The crypto exchange insists that the CFTC is overstepping its boundaries by seeking to impose regulations on entities and individuals overseas. This ongoing dismissal process, due to the prolonged court-imposed deadlines for responses from the CFTC and Binance, is projected to linger well into 2024.
In this legal battle, the inclusion of Eeon appears to be nothing more than an unnecessary distraction for both the SEC and Binance. With the collective pushback from these powerhouses, Eeon's involvement looks to be short-lived, making the crypto-legal landscape no less complex.
