Link copied 
June 14 marked a pivotal moment for Binance.US, the American arm of the globally recognized cryptocurrency exchange, as it entered into an agreement with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Their pact aims to keep the digital cash vault running, instead of freezing its vast assets.
The mediator in this crypto showdown was U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson, who wisely decided to refer the adversaries to a magistrate judge. Her intention was clear - to secure a mutually beneficial compromise to safeguard customer assets without the need to shut down the exchange.
In a public hearing on the eve of the agreement, Judge Jackson emphasized the drastic repercussions a full shutdown could have for both Binance.US and the larger digital asset market. She deferred her judgment on the SEC's request for a temporary restraining order against the company, pending the results of the magistrate-mediated negotiation.
Despite the heated contention, Judge Jackson observed that the SEC and Binance.US were not far from reaching an agreement, adding an air of optimism to the proceedings. The tension had escalated after John Reed Stark, a former SEC enforcement attorney, hinted at the conflicts that each party hoped to resolve at the hearing.
The tussle originated from an emergency motion filed by the SEC against Binance.US earlier in June, centered on allegations against Changpeng "CZ" Zhao, the CEO of Binance. The SEC raised concerns over the potential for Zhao to access Binance.US customer funds, claiming that he had transferred a substantial $12 billion of Binance's assets through his controlled entity, Merit Peak.
However, just days before the hearing, Binance.US and Zhao fought back, denying all claims of fund misappropriation and challenging the SEC by stating that it could not identify a single instance of customer fund misuse. As the case progresses, the next update from the ongoing negotiations is expected by the close of business on June 15.
