Momentum is building in Washington for the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, a major piece of crypto legislation aimed at integrating the digital asset sector into the U.S. financial system. Senator Thom Tillis has signaled that recent negotiations may have resolved key concerns from banking stakeholders, particularly around the controversial issue of stablecoin rewards.
According to Tillis, discussions with banking lobbyists have “addressed a lot of the concerns” related to interest-bearing stablecoins potentially competing with traditional bank deposits. With progress being made, the senator is now urging Senate Banking Committee leadership to move forward with the bill’s markup process. This step is critical, as it allows lawmakers to propose amendments before advancing the legislation to a full Senate vote.
A markup hearing could take place as early as mid-May, a timeline that industry advocates see as crucial. With limited legislative days remaining before the midterm election cycle intensifies, any delay could jeopardize the Clarity Act’s chances in 2026. The bill is widely considered the crypto industry’s top legislative priority in the U.S.
Tillis has also indicated that stakeholders, including banking representatives, will have an opportunity to review updated language on stablecoin yield ahead of the hearing. While some disagreements remain, there is optimism that additional compromises can be reached through continued negotiations.
Support for the bill appears to be growing within the crypto sector. Industry leaders, including Digital Chamber CEO Cody Carbone, have expressed confidence that the legislation will soon be placed on the committee calendar. Meanwhile, political pressure is increasing, with former President Donald Trump publicly stating he would not allow banking interests to derail the bill.
However, challenges remain. Lawmakers are still debating provisions such as restrictions on government officials’ involvement in crypto businesses and whether certain elements, including DeFi protections, should be reviewed by other Senate committees.
If passed by the Senate, the bill would move to the House of Representatives, which previously approved its own version. Despite some recent tensions between the chambers, crypto advocates remain hopeful for final approval.
Comment 0