Link copied 
U.S. regulatory authorities have put the spotlight on cryptocurrency venture BarnBridge. In response to impending legal measures and possible monetary penalties, the project has opted for a unique strategy by turning to its token-holding community for a decision.
On Tuesday, the decentralized finance (DeFi) initiative presented its token holders with the option to grant founders Tyler Ward and Troy Murray the autonomy to act in compliance with the directives issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This includes potential reimbursements.
Initially, BarnBridge aspired to create fixed-yield assets tailored for adept crypto enthusiasts. However, their aspirations were halted in July upon disclosing an ongoing SEC inquiry.
Though the specifics of the potential violation remain undisclosed, the SEC's engagement hints at the possibility of BarnBridge offering what could be perceived as securities to American investors. Judging by the recent voting process initiated by the DeFi project, there's an indication that Ward and Murray are gearing up to fulfill the SEC's requirements, even if that means ceasing operations.
The voting proposal outlines a plan to convert the organization's reserves and permits Ward and Murray the freedom to allocate the tokens. The details regarding the distribution recipients remain unspecified. Current records suggest that BarnBridge's reserve funds total over $200,000 in multiple cryptocurrencies, stored across two digital wallets. A portion of these funds is designated for covering legal charges as outlined in the proposal.
BarnBridge is not the pioneering decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) to be under the SEC's radar. However, their unique approach to soliciting their community's input on the way forward is noteworthy.
It's worth mentioning, however, that as of the time of reporting, the voting process appears largely symbolic. Only a single voter was identified as "BarnBridge.eth", linked to the project's official team.
Requests for insights from BarnBridge's legal representative remained unanswered, as did queries directed at the SEC.
